It’s a few simple clicks to select the dimensional parameters I want to vary, and the range they should vary within. Some quick tips are to use equidistant mesh control and at least one Solution Adaptive mesh refinement to capture the complex pressure field that develops. There are good posts and forum discussions about this already. My study is a 2D domain and is a fixed 6 degree angle of attack. I am not going to dive in to meshing or much of the “windtunnel” study set up. I used this because I had previously validated my meshing strategy by matching to NACA 2412 section lift and drag results with these same flow conditions. The Flow Simulation was set up to match a Reynold’s Number of 3.1 x10^6. Varying thickness, camber, and position of max camber I set up the base sketch to vary in airfoil thickness, camber, and position of max camber: I decided to give this a try by optimizing a low-speed (M ~ 0.25) airfoil suitable for use on a small aircraft.
![solidworks flow simulation cooler solidworks flow simulation cooler](https://www.3deduworks.de/images/flowsim1.jpg)
This means we can set up a Design of Experiments in Flow, varying model or study characteristics and evaluating the performance of our design. With the release of SOLIDWORKS 2017, Flow Simulation introduces Multiparameter Optimization. You are probably aware of parametric studies that are available in SOLIDWORKS as part of a Design Study, a Parametric Optimization in Simulation Professional, and Parametric Study in Flow Simulation.
#Solidworks flow simulation cooler software#
Today, we engineers have access to incredible software and computing power. Wright Brothers example airfoil testing ( ) Specifically, they investigated 2D airfoil characteristics of camber (curvature) and thickness, as well as 3D wing parameters like planform aspect ratio and shape.
#Solidworks flow simulation cooler series#
They crafted a series of parametric experiments to explore the relationship between wing shape and aerodynamic performance. The cut plot and flow trajectory results show a dramatic drop in outlet temperature, around 25c! This colder, denser air means a bigger combustion bang resulting in more power and, according to SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation, the bigger the better.In the Fall and Winter of 1901, Orville and Wilbur Wright completed the most comprehensive study of airfoils to-date in their experimental wind tunnel in Dayton, Ohio. 15m/s of 30c air at the inlet and static pressure on the outlet: We’ll also add a Velocity parameter in the z direction of 31 m/s (70mph) to simulate the car travelling along a typical motorway at speed.įor the boundary conditions we’ll keep it simple.
![solidworks flow simulation cooler solidworks flow simulation cooler](https://vihoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/flow-cac-tinh-nang-1024x502.jpg)
3c (270k) ambient should simulate the Scottish summer nicely. Next we’ll use the intuitive Flow Simulation wizard interface to start building our study.Īfter being compressed to almost 2 bar by the turbo forced induction air can get hot! As the intercoolers job is to lower this temperature as rapidly as possible we’re definitely interested in heat conduction in this study.
![solidworks flow simulation cooler solidworks flow simulation cooler](https://de.visiativ-solutions.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/flow-simu-forma.jpg)
We’ll begin by adding lids to the inlet and outlet of the intercooler (highlighted in red) because we intend to run an internal analysis. In truth it probably is but it could always be a little faster, right?Ī popular power boosting modification is to swap out your intercooler for a larger unit but how does this help? Well let’s use SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation to find out. A thought on the mind of petrol heads (admittedly, just like me) the world over. “Sure… my car is fast but is it really fast enough?”.